Sunday, May 28, 2006

Chaos in the Capitol

From CBSNews.com
Necessary precaution, or overkill? Read on, and decide for yourself.
(CBS/AP) A phone call reporting gunfire — apparently a false alarm — led police to briefly shut down the Capitol Friday and search the largest House office building floor by floor as staff members and a few lawmakers were kept inside.

Officers with rifles stood by outside, and ambulances arrived. But in the end police said there were no arrests, injuries or confirmation of the gunfire report that had been called in by an unidentified congressional employee.

The report originated with Rep. Jim Saxton, R-N.J., his press secretary said. Saxton heard what he thought were gunshots and had a member of his staff call Capitol Police, said spokesman Greg Keeley.

CBS News correspondent Jim Stewart reports that a hammer was mistaken for the sound of gunfire.

A woman stepped off an elevator in the basement garage of the Rayburn Building and heard what she thought was gunfire, Stewart reports. What she did not know was that the elevator next to her was under repair and a maintenance man was on its roof whacking away with a hammer.

"FBI and Capitol Hill police have duplicated the sound and believe that's what she heard," reports Stewart. ...

On high alert, police lined the street between the Capitol and the Rayburn building, rifles prominently displayed, and four ambulances, two firetrucks and other emergency vehicles were on the scene. Police methodically searched the sprawling building, where congressional staff members had locked themselves into their offices as a precaution. ...

The search was a complicated one. The building, which covers a long city block, is connected to a second office building by an underground tunnel. That building, in turn, is connected to the Capitol by a second underground tunnel.

Nearly two hours after the first alert, Capitol police sent an e-mail message to occupants of the office building saying they would soon begin a floor-by-floor search.

"During the search, the police officers will knock three times on each office door, announce 'United States Capitol Police,' knock three additional times," and then confirm their identity by speaking a code word, it said. ...

Cathy Travis, a spokeswoman for Rep. Solomon Ortiz, D-Texas, was in his fourth-floor office at 1 p.m. when "four or five really huge, burly young cops did a boom, boom, boom on the front door and walked in."

She said they told her and others to stay where they were and stay out of the way for a search that she said didn't seem to take more than a minute as they checked IDs and all parts of the office.

Steven Broderick, press spokesman for Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass., was in his car in the Rayburn garage Friday morning getting ready to drive his boss to the airport, when he was ordered by a Capitol Police officer to park the car and put his hands on the steering wheel. The officer then told him to run toward an exit where other officers where gathered.

"He just told me to run and don't look back," Broderick said.

An Associated Press reporter heard noise outside a Rayburn press room and peeked out the door. A police officer, gun drawn, shouted, "Get in the room. Get in the room... ."
Was it putting on a show? Over-reacting? Or were Capitol Police performing to the highest call of duty?

I commend them for the way they risk their lives day in and day out in the line of duty. But come on, a hammer? Really? I wasn't there, but I can't imagine a hammer making a sound that could be mistaken for gunfire.

What about you? Let me know what you think.

Joe

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Average Joe,

In your posting on 05-28-06 you asked if the actions of the police was "Necessary precaution, or overkill?". I suggest that it was both.

Sir Robert Peel, widely regarded as the father of modern policing, said: "The police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence."

And that is exactly what modern policing was intended to be, and should be. However, over time the role of policing has been perverted and re-shaped. Much of the general public today see the police as the Enforcement Arm of the Government and the Protectors of Society. Most people do not view police as being a part of the public, but rather something outside the realm of the general public, in place to keep them safe and others in-line.

Police work has moved into a period where the police, rather than being a part of the public, instead must respond to the public needs and expectations. Most people view the police as an entirely different set of people, set in place to meet their needs and expectations for safety. This is why the same person will complain about reckless driving AND complain that he received a speeding ticket.

Further, the public has placed expectations on the police that they (police) will respond in certain ways during certain situations. If they respond too strongly, they are criticized. If they respond too weakly, they are criticized. There are even situations, such as Columbine, where the police were criticized for being both too weak (the immediate police response), and too strong (the later police response).

So, in the case about which you wrote on 05-28-06, I suggest that the response was indeed "overkill". The reality of the situation certainly did not call for such a strong response. However, at the same time it was a "necessary precaution", because the response was probably what was expected of the police by the public, given the totality of the situation (location, statement of the witness, etc.). Robert Peel also said, "No minister ever stood, or could stand, against public opinion." So the police must do what the public wants from them, whether it is right or not.

Remember, that "hammer mistaken for gun fire" was mistaken by the witness, not by the police. It was the police who figured out what the lady likely heard, and that it was not likely to have been gun fire.

After having read about, studied, and worked in law enforcement for over 20 years now, I am not very optimistic about the appropriateness of the direction in which we (both police and public) are headed. But, it is the direction that is mandated by the public. Therefore, it is the road that we must travel.

Average Joe's Average Brother

Average Joe's Review Store